But, this review today will just discuss on one of them yet about OM2 and OM3. table#t74 thead tr th#t74.end { Your email address will not be published. } table#t74 tbody tr.table-alternate { line-height: 2.0; Re: The All-New Behringer Keyboards 'n' Stuff Thread, The All-New Behringer Keyboards 'n' Stuff Thread. The resistance to popping seems a little more robust with this mic than with the OM5, and the overall sonic character isn’t very different from that of the more expensive OM7, which probably makes it my favourite of the bunch when it comes to performance/cost ratio. Of course you do have to be careful with tight hypercardioid–pattern mics to keep them ‘on–axis’ when using them, otherwise the level can drop off quite dramatically as you move around the mic. - Provides exceptional gain before feedback, - Low impedance allows interference free performance. Physically the mic has a distinctive flared body shape, and both the zinc body and steel basket are finished in a durable black coating. A soft pouch and clip come as standard with each mic. Prices include VAT. The tonal change due to proximity effect is noticeable as you move close to the mic, where the most natural tonal balance seems to be at around two to three inches away from the mouth. The frequency range is about 50kHz until 18 kHz with a very low mass diaphgram for a clean and natural sound with an exceptional transient response. background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); If you’re looking for a new stage mic, it’s worth looking further afield than the usual models — as these classy examples prove! We know that this time, the review explained more in the performance while the previous Audix OM2 vs Sennheiser E835 was discussing more on the features. background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#660000), color-stop(100%,#8F0000)); Overall, this is a clean performer that does exactly as claimed offering both clarity and resistance to feedback. Mastering Essentials Part 4 - Mastering EQ: Balance, Don’t Match. Color. Why Are Some A-B Stereo Arrays Angled Outwards? color: #EEEEEE; $('.ptp-row-id-'+index).matchHeight(false); The main difference that I can see is in the capsule tuning, where the low end has that same ‘warmth’ hump between 100 and 200 Hz, but the presence curve shape differs slightly, having two distinct humps, one around 4kHz and one peaking at around 12kHz. An all-around great mic for vocals and a wide range of instruments, the OM2 handheld dynamic mic features a VLM type-B capsule which gives you warmth in the lower mid-bass and a slight boost in the midrange. CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS IN THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Again it exhibits a good resistance to feedback. width: 50%; border-style: outset; That said, I actually think the Sennheiser e935 beats both of these, as it has a startlingly crisp response, does well with pretty much anything you throw at it, and you can move around a lot on stage with it much like a 58. margin: 20px 0; table#t74 tbody tr:hover td { Its tight hypercardioid polar response is tailored to provide optimum feedback rejection, and it is said to be more tolerant than most to performers who cup their hands around the mic basket. table#t74 thead tr { All four deliver a quality sound that compares well with their contemporaries, though the performance generally tracks the price, and the more expensive models exhibit more of a studio–like ‘airy’ clarity at the high end. background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); background: #660000; Their tight hypercardioid pattern gives good feedback rejection yet the mics are not excessively sensitive at the rear, which bodes well for use close to stage monitors. vertical-align: top;width: 100%;border-top: 1px solid #CCCCCC;border-right: 1px solid #CCCCCC;box-shadow: 0 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4); The mics we are looking at here are all dynamic models in the Audix OM series, intended primarily for professional live use (though they also have numerous studio applications). All the mics in this series are capable of excellent results, both live and in the studio, combining good ergonomics with solid engineering. The specified overall frequency range is 40Hz to 19kHz, and the sensitivity is slightly lower than that of the OM5, at 1.5mV/Pa at 1kHz. The Audix OM2 is suitable for live vocal work and especially when you add 5db smooth lift between 2kHz until 8 kHz, dropping a little bit above that which conveniently reduces breath noises. The Audix OM2 is Hypercardioid, while the SM58 is Cardioid. background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#660000), color-stop(100%,#8F0000)); Live Vocal Microphone Comparison featuring the Shure SM58, the Sennheiser e835, the AKG D5 & the AUDIX OM2 Live Vocal Mic Comparison and Review. I have an OM2 that is better than the i5. Audix OM2 The maximum SPL is 140dB and the sensitivity a little higher than from the other mics, at 2.3mV/Pa at 1kHz. OM2 $109, OM3 $149, OM5 $195, OM6 $239, OM7 $255, OM11 $320. font-size: 1.0em; table#t74 thead tr th#t74.start { Frankmsax. Audix OM2 vs. Shure SM58 | SUBTLE DIFFERENCE! If you … 03-19-2019, 08:41 PM. His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in an crowded industry. table#t74 tbody tr { Audix OM3 That is the one area that Shure … • border-width: 0px; Resistance to feedback is impressive. The sensitivity is deliberately lower than that of the previous models, at 0.8mV/Pa at 1kHz, to provide plenty of headroom — though this places greater demands on the mixer or preamp quality. Required fields are marked *, “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”, “Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! } Features a proprietary anti-feedback design for great handling, and it is built to last. All four mics exhibit low handling noise, and they feel comfortable for handheld use. table#t74 thead tr th.t74 { border-width: 0px; The Sm58’s grille is also a tad larger.